Follow CBSMIAMI.COM: Facebook | Twitter

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) — Siding with U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson’s campaign and national Democrats, a federal judge early Thursday gave voters until 5 p.m. Saturday to fix ballots that were rejected because of mismatched signatures.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker’s ruling came hours before a 3 p.m. Thursday deadline for a machine recount to be completed in the U.S. Senate race between Nelson and Republican Gov. Rick Scott, whose 56,000-vote election-night lead had dwindled to fewer than 13,000 votes when the recount was ordered.

The lawsuit focuses on part of Florida law that requires signatures on mail-in and provisional ballots to match signatures on file with elections offices. Voters whose ballots are delivered by 5 p.m. the day before an election have the opportunity to “cure” signature mismatches. But people whose mail-in ballots are received after that, or voters who cast provisional ballots on Election Day, do not.

County canvassing boards make decisions about whether signatures match, and thus whether ballots should be counted. But counties don’t have uniform regulations to govern the decisions, Democrats argued, making the process unconstitutional.

The judge agreed.

“The precise issue in this case is whether Florida’s law that allows county election officials to reject vote-by-mail and provisional ballots for mismatched signatures — with no standards, an illusory process to cure, and no process to challenge the rejection — passes constitutional muster. The answer is simple. It does not,” Walker wrote in a 34-page order.

Walker called the opportunity to fix a ballot “the last chance a vote-by-mail voter has to save their vote from being rejected and not counted.”

“Florida law provides no opportunity for voters to challenge the determination of the canvassing board that their signatures do not match, and their votes do not count,” he wrote.

In contrast, the law allows voters or candidates to challenge signatures that were accepted, Walker noted.

Nelson’s campaign lawyer Marc Elias released a statement Thursday, “Today’s decision is a victory for the people of Florida and for the Nelson campaign as we pursue our goal of making sure every legal ballot is counted. The court’s ruling impacts thousands of ballots, and that number will likely increase as larger counties like Broward add their ballots to the total pool which can be cured. We are taking several steps to ensure the rights of every Floridian are protected, and this is one major step forward.”

Scott’s campaign quickly said Thursday it was appealing Walker’s decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“We are immediately appealing this baseless decision and we are confident we will prevail in the Eleventh Circuit,” Scott spokeswoman Lauren Schenone said in a statement.

During a lengthy hearing Wednesday, Florida Division of Elections Director Maria Matthews testified that 45 counties tossed a total of 3,668 mail-in ballots and 93 provisional ballots due to mismatched signatures. Two large counties — Duval and Miami-Dade — had not reported their results, and Walker estimated about 5,000 ballots statewide would have been rejected.

There are dozens of reasons for a signature mismatch, even if the person signing is the voter, Walker wrote.

“What this case comes down to is that without procedural safeguards, the use of signature matching is not reasonable and may lead to unconstitutional disenfranchisement,” the judge wrote.

Although the signature matching process is problematic, Walker said he couldn’t think of another way for canvassing boards to confirm voters’ identities.

“What makes Florida’s signature matching process even more problematic is that fact that counties have discretion to apply their own standards and procedures,” he wrote. “The only way such a scheme can be reasonable is if there are mechanisms in place to protect against arbitrary and unreasonable decisions by canvassing boards to reject ballots based on signature mismatches.”

Two years ago, Walker struck down a previous law that allowed voters who had not signed their mail-in ballot envelopes to “cure” the ballots but did not allow voters with mismatched signatures the same latitude. The law was subsequently changed.

But the judge said in court Wednesday that the law hasn’t been fixed.

“The cure period was intended to solve the inherent problems in signature matching, but the opportunity to cure has proven illusory,” he wrote in Thursday’s ruling.

Voters whose ballots were rejected were notified after it was too late to fix them, Walker wrote.

“Without this court’s intervention, these potential voters have no remedy. Rather they are simply out of luck and deprived of the right to vote. What is shocking about Florida law is that even though a voter cannot challenge a vote rejected as illegal, any voter or candidate could challenge a vote accepted as legal,” he added.

The state’s “scheme unconstitutionally burdens the fundamental right of Florida citizens to vote and have their votes counted,” he decided.

Lawyers representing Secretary of State Ken Detzner, the National Republican Senatorial Committee and Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office argued, among other things, that the plaintiffs waited too long to file the lawsuit. Walker rejected that argument.

The Republicans also argued that requiring extra ballots to be counted will unduly burden the election and disrupt election procedures, thus eroding the public’s confidence in the electoral process.

But, quoting from a federal judge in a Georgia case involving a dispute between gubernatorial candidates Stacey Abrams and Brian Kemp, Walker wrote that he “does not understand how assuring that all eligible voters are permitted to vote undermines the integrity of the election process.”

Any hardship endured by the state is “outweighed by the risk of unconstitutionally depriving eligible voters of their right to vote and have that vote counted,” he found.

Walker stressed that he was not requiring counties to count all of the ballots rejected for signature mismatches, but he ordered them to give “the limited number of affected voters” the opportunity to fix them before the “second unofficial results” are due at noon Sunday, following a manual recount.

So far, that involves just over 4,000 rejected ballots, Walker wrote.

“The county supervisors of elections and canvassing boards are surely up to the task,” Walker wrote.

(©2018 CBS Local Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The News Service of Florida’s Dara Kam contributed to this report.)

Comments (30)
  1. Terry Honeycutt says:

    It is obvious this judge does not respect laws. This ruling will be thrown out under appeal.

    1. jwden123 says:

      The best judge Dem money can buy

  2. Henry Crum says:

    I.E. don’t follow Florida law. Was any reason given that the Florida law was not constitutional? Obviously the people that had bad signatures were allowed to vote. The question becomes if people that do not follow election law should have their votes counted. I do not think the constitution demands that they do.

  3. Don McCoy says:

    I guess forgery isn’t forgery if a (Leftist) Judge says it isn’t…

  4. Jeff Mitchell says:

    Of course, a liberal judge!

  5. An obama appointee………. Go figure.

  6. Harold Riley says:

    It is interesting that Democrats have such a problem (a) counting, and (b) determining whether signatures are valid. One would think after decades running Broward and Palm Beach counties they’d know how. Of course, that would interfere with this type of biennial fiasco and opportunity to steal elections.

  7. Ranbo Lee says:

    Attempted theft by deception – typical Dem actions

  8. Mark Em says:

    So, will the Democrats running the recount only ask those fellow Democrats that forgot how to write to come in and “fix” their signature, leaving the Republicans that cannot write disenfranchised (key word for this election)?

  9. Barry Hirsh says:

    Another Obama appointee. ‘Don’t like the law? Just write a NEW one.

  10. …all part of the ongoing process of degrading the qualifications for verifying that the person casting the vote is who he/she claims to be.

    What else do you expect from a Dem party seeking power by ANY means necessary?

  11. Katie Atkinson says:

    We need to have thumb print not signature required on every federal election and concessions only made for those with no thumb. Any Election office employee caught allowing foreign interference (non citizen votes) or election tampering by double ballots, fraud should face 1 year in jail for each illegal vote.

  12. So in an age where schools are no longer teaching how to read and write cursive;
    What is a signature ? Most retail checkouts that require electronic signatures accept an ‘X’.

  13. tngilmer says:

    I hope the 11th Circuit slaps down this Obama appointed judge quickly and firmly.

  14. Vincent Ardizzone says:

    What a farce. FOLLOW THE LAW!

  15. Pete Griff says:

    Another Leftist Activist on the Bench.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s