Follow CBSMIAMI.COM: Facebook | Twitter

WASHINGTON (CBSMiami/AP) – The Supreme Court will hear a case Wednesday that could affect the millions of women who work while pregnant.

The case involves Peggy Young, a former United Parcel Service worker, who was denied a temporary assignment to avoid lifting heavy packages in 2006.

Young says she should have been offered light-duty work because some UPS workers were.

The court is weighing whether the company’s actions violated the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

The Atlanta-based package delivery company says it will voluntarily offer pregnant women light duty starting in January. But the company contends it complied with the law in Young’s case.

CLICK HERE To Watch Rhiannon Ally’s report

The question at the Supreme Court is whether UPS was required to accommodate Young, 42, because it gave temporary assignments to some workers, including those who were injured on the job or had a condition that was covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act.

More than 120 Democrats are backing legislation that would change federal law to make explicit the requirement to accommodate pregnant women. Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey said the bill is modeled after the landmark disabilities law. “It would make sure that pregnant workers have the same measure of protection,” Casey said, before the start of a rally outside the court Wednesday in support of Young.

The Obama administration and an unusual array of liberal and conservative interest groups are backing Young, who lives with her 7-year-old daughter, Triniti, in Lorton, Virginia.

Young’s dispute with UPS arose after she gave her supervisor a doctor’s note recommending that she not lift packages heavier than 20 pounds. Young said she dealt almost exclusively with overnight letters, but UPS said its drivers must be able to lift packages weighing up to 70 pounds. Young left the company in 2009.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is among those on UPS’ side. The chamber says many of its members do provide additional benefits to pregnant workers, but says policies at thousands of companies would be upended if the court were to rule for Young. Lower federal courts have rejected her claim.

Since the justices agreed in July to hear the case, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission updated guidance to employers to make clear that they should accommodate people in Young’s situation. Yet the U.S. Postal Service, an independent federal agency, maintains the practice that UPS has now abandoned, UPS said in court papers. The Postal Service declined to comment.

A decision in Young v. UPS, 12-1226, is expected by late June.

(TM and © Copyright 2014 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

RELATED CONTENT:

[display-posts category=”news” wrapper=”ul” posts_per_page=”5″]

Comments