TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/AP) — A highly unusual statement came out of the 1st District Court of Appeal Thursday on the drawing on new political maps.
The court said it shouldn’t have intervened in the trial over whether state legislators broke the law when drawing up the maps.
The court ruled on Thursday that three judges on the court were wrong when they decided in May that evidence taken from a Gainesville political consulting firm could not be used in a redistricting trial.
The appeals court by a 5-4 vote ruled the state Supreme Court should have been asked to resolve the dispute immediately. Six judges recused themselves from the decision.
The evidence was heard at the trial after the Florida Supreme Court ordered it. But the evidence was kept secret from the public.
A verdict in the trial still has not been reached.
(TM and © Copyright 2014 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2014 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
- Roy Moore Refuses To Concede Alabama Election
- Trump Makes Final Pitch To American People On Tax Reform
- Trump On Alabama: ‘I Was Right’ Moore Wouldn’t Be Able To Win
- Text Messages Raise Questions About FBI Employees’ Political Bias
- How Doug Jones Won: Measuring The ‘Alabama Earthquake’