cbs4 My 33 Header Logo

Local

O.J. Simpson Back In Court, Wants New Trial

View Comments
(Photo by Jeff Scheid-Pool/Getty Images)

(Photo by Jeff Scheid-Pool/Getty Images)

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up
South Florida Crime

LAS VEGAS (CBSMiami/AP) – Currently serving a prison sentence of more than 30 years, O.J. Simpson is back in court seeking a new trial.

The last time the former football star was in a Las Vegas courtroom, he stood next to defense attorney Yale Galanter. On Monday, Simpson will return to Clark County District Court with a different set of lawyers hoping to convince a judge that Galanter shouldn’t have been handling his armed robbery-kidnapping case.

Simpson claims that Galanter, who he paid nearly $700,000 for his legal services, failed to disclose that he knew about the plan in advance, told Simpson it was legal and provided bad advice at trial.
“To me, the claims are solid. I don’t know how the court can’t grant relief,” said Patricia Palm, Simpson’s appeals lawyer.

Palm filed a nearly a 100 page petition which dissects Galanter’s promises, payments and performance as Simpson’s lawyer in the trial that ended with a jury finding Simpson and a co-defendant guilty of 12 felonies.

Galanter declined to comment ahead of his is scheduled testimony.

Of the 22 allegations of conflict-of-interest and ineffective counsel that Palm raised, Clark County District Court Judge Linda Marie Bell has agreed to hear 19.

The five-day proceeding in neither, technically, a trial nor appeal.  The judge will listen to testimony before deciding whether Simpson deserves a new trial. It’s not clear whether Bell will rule immediately.

Simpson says that Galanter knew ahead of time about his plan to retrieve what he thought were personal mementoes and met with Simpson in Las Vegas to discuss the plan the night before Simpson and five other men confronted two sports memorabilia dealers and a middleman in a cramped casino hotel room in September 2007.

Simpson maintains the plan was to take back what he expected would be family photos and personal belongings stolen from him after his 1995 “trial of the century” acquittal in the slayings of his wife and her friend in Los Angeles.

Galanter blessed the plan as within the law, as long as no one trespassed and no force was used, Simpson said.

The first witness Dr. Norman Roitman, a Las Vegas psychiatrist, will testify that Simpson’s perception of what took place in the Palace Station hotel room might have been hampered by football brain injuries and the effects of several vodka and cranberry juice cocktails he consumed before the confrontation.

H. Leon Simon and Leah Beverly, the Clark County deputy district attorneys representing the state, are scheduled to call another psychiatrist later in the week for another opinion.

Simpson trial co-counsel Gabriel Grasso is also scheduled Monday to testify.

Grasso and Galanter split in months after the trial, and Grasso later sued Galanter in federal court alleging breach of contract and nonpayment of legal fees. Grasso alleges that Galanter promised him $250,000 but paid just $15,000. Galanter responded with a defamation and slander lawsuit, filed in Miami.

In a sworn statement outlining what he will say, Grasso said he doesn’t know if Galanter advised Simpson about recovering property before the incident, and doesn’t know if Galanter told Simpson about a prosecution offer of a plea deal.

But Grasso said he thought Simpson should testify before the jury.

During trial, Simpson contends, Galanter “vigorously discouraged” him not to testify, and never told him that prosecutors were willing to let him plead guilty to charges that would have gotten him a minimum of two years in prison.

“He consistently told me the state could not prove its case because I acted within my rights in retaking my own property,” Simpson said in a sworn statement outlining what he plans to say when he testifies this week.

Some who’ve watched the Simpson saga say he might have a chance.

“I think there’s a lot to this,” said John Momot, a lawyer nearing 40 years of criminal defense in Las Vegas who played himself in the 1995 movie “Casino” and provided expert cable TV commentary during Simpson’s monthlong trial in September 2008.

“I don’t think O.J. Simpson could ever get a fair trial, period, based on his reputation from California,” Momot said. “But based on these allegations, if you took Joe Jones from the street and put him in the same situation, I think it would be possible he’d get a new trial.”

Simpson’s lawyers also say that while continuing to represent Simpson through oral arguments in a failed 2010 appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court, Galanter kept a lid on his own behind-the-scenes involvement. That nearly extinguished any chance Simpson had to claim ineffective representation in state or federal courts.

(TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,475 other followers