Local

Report: Judge In Spence-Jones Case Once Investigated Her

View Comments
Michelle Spence-Jones listens to testimony in her trial on bribery and grand theft charges.  (Source: CBS4)

Michelle Spence-Jones listens to testimony in her trial on bribery and grand theft charges. (Source: CBS4)

Gary-Nelson-600x450 Gary Nelson
Gary Nelson has been a member of the CBS4 News team since Septem...
Read More

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up
Legislative Session Coverage

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – The intrigue surrounding whether Miami Commissioner Michelle Spence-Jones can seek a third term took another turn Friday when CBS4 news partner the Miami Herald discovered the judge who ruled against her this week once investigated her in a public corruption case.

According to the Herald, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jorge E. Cueto’s lack of disclosure about his past could affect the outcome of his ruling issued Tuesday that said Spence-Jones couldn’t seek a third-term in office.

The Herald reported that Spence-Jones’ lawyer knew Cueto had worked as a prosecutor but only found out on Wednesday that the judge had once investigated Spence-Jones for allegedly shaking down a developer seeking approval for a condo-tower project.

“I was shocked, I was stunned,” Spence-Jones told CBS4’s Gary Nelson Friday. “We got this anonymous tip that, hey, you need to check the judge.”

Cueto ruled earlier this week that Spence-Jones couldn’t run for a third term in November, despite Spence-Jones being suspended for office for roughly two years while she fought felony charges in other corruption cases.

Cueto said the city charter limited Spence-Jones to two terms because she “was elected and qualified for two consecutive full terms.”

What Cueto did not reveal was that he was a member of a public corruption unit that targeted Spence-Jones in multiple investigations, none of them successful. A Miami-Dade jury all but laughed the most serious case against Spence-Jones out of court, finding her not guilty on all counts in a matter of minutes.

Spence-Jones said she was incredulous to learn that Cueto, who shot down her political hopes this week, once had her in his cross hairs as a prosecutor. She said it’s inconceivable that he would fail to reveal so huge a conflict:

“’I was a prosecutor and I was actually involved in a case against Miss Jones,’ and if he had said that, ‘does anybody have a an issue with that?’ I would have been the first one to raise my hand saying ‘Yes, I have an issue with that, Judge,’” Spence-Jones said.

“He should have disclosed, he should have recused himself from it. I was blown away,” Spence-Jones said in the interview at her home in Liberty City.

Spence-Jones has filed a lawsuit against Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle, alleging she was the target of a series of baseless, politically motivated prosecutions.

In learning that the Judge who ruled against her political aspirations this week previously worked to nail her in a criminal case, Spence-Jones stopped just short of wondering how deep the alleged conspiracy against her might run.

“To be hit with this, you know, it’s like, wow. It’s almost like, in a sense, reliving everything I have been through,” she said.

Judge Cueto, through a court spokesperson, declined to comment for this report, noting the case is on going.

Spence-Jones hopes to be back in front of the Judge – who once sought to put her away – and persuade him to step away, allowing a less entangled jurist to hear her case.

Her attorney, Bruce Rogow, is preparing motions seeking Cueto’s removal from the case.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,534 other followers