TALLAHASSEE (CBS4) — A Senate panel backed off considerably from a proposal to require state workers to make contributions to their pension fund, exempting many state workers, and cutting back the amount others would have to chip in.

On a 12-1 vote, the Senate Government Oversight and Accountability Committee on Thursday evening approved a bill that exempted members of the Florida Retirement System making less than $40,000 – a huge segment of those in the system – from having to contribute anything toward their retirement plan.

Under the amended bill (SB 1130), those state workers making under $75,000 would keep the option of remaining in the state pension fund, while those making more than that would be forced to take a 401 (k) style proposal without a defined benefit.

In addition to exempting everyone making less than $40,000 from having to contribute to their pension, the measure would cap the contribution rate for those making between $40,000 and $75,000 at 2 percent.

Regular class pension fund members making more than that would have to contribute 2 percent of their first $75,000 in salary and 4 percent of what they make above that. Senior administrators and elected officials would simply pay 4 percent of their full salary if they make more than $75,000.

The proposal is dramatically softer on state workers than the 5 percent contribution requirement initially sought by the committee and still being proposed by Gov. Rick Scott.

“This committee does not believe that the state worker is the enemy,” said the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Jeremy Ring, D-Margate. “We’re not demonizing the state workers.”

Ring reminded a committee room full of firefighters, police and emergency workers, though, that the measure has another committee stop, and in the Senate Budget Committee, it’s likely some of the panel’s effort to make the bill easier on state workers might be undone.

“I’m hopeful we can hold onto a lot of it,” Ring said afterward. “We’re going to try to.”

Pressed, Ring acknowledged that keeping workers who make less than $40,000 from having to contribute anything toward their pension was going to be difficult.

“The budget committee is going to look at that,” Ring said. “I’m not sure that ultimately that stays in.”

That exemption was put into the bill by an amendment by Sen. Charlie Dean, R-Inverness, a former sheriff. Sheriffs around the state have urged lawmakers – and did again in the committee on Thursday – to consider that many police and other government workers accept lower pay for the trade of a good pension that they don’t have to pay into.

Ring said he didn’t know how many pension fund members made under $40,000, but figured it was most. State workforce statistics show that nearly 75 percent of all state employees earn less than that, and 65 percent of workers are in the Florida Retirement System.

Another change made in the committee would make the employee contributions required only when the pension fund has less money than it would need to pay out all benefits.

The lone “no” vote on the committee for the bill came from Sen. Gary Siplin, D-Orlando.

While acknowledging that the new approach may not have full support as the bill goes through the process, Ring did note that 12 senators voted for the bill Thursday, and could probably be counted on to vote for the bill in its current form on the floor. That’s more than half way to a majority of 21 that would be needed to pass a bill and it’s a bipartisan group, Ring pointed out.

Doug Martin, a spokesman for AFSCME, a union that represents a large number of state workers, stopped short of saying the union would support the new version of the measure.

“It’s better than it was,” Martin said. “Much better.” Still, he too, noted that it may not stay as is.

Scott and Republicans in the House have said they want FRS members to put 5 percent of their salaries toward their pension as a way of showing $1.3 billion in savings as lawmakers try to close a budget gap.

(© 2011 The News Service of Florida. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Comments (3)
  1. Luis Morse says:

    Even in Social Security , contributions are required , so why not to the FRS?

  2. Jan says:

    As a TRS member for 40 years, I contributed 5% towards pension.

  3. Rick in Florida says:

    What state is Jan,s retirement system ? Maybe, he/she dosen’t realize that Florida Retirement System workers on average start at a significantly lower salary than in most states. and is the reason our pension is fully funded by the state of Florida . Also it was on that promise from the state that people agreed to work under the Florida retirement system starting at a lower salary. I am currently a Florida system employee that has 29.8 years with the system and was expecting to retire during a specific year. However, people don’t realize what we as Florida employees have is our own earned time, money and investments. It is owed to us, our unused sick time and vacation time is time we accrued and chose not to use, while other spent theirs and wasted their retirement funds on bad investment. FRS was a solid but low yielding fund. While private sector employees made money all was well, now that they all lost their so call good investments they want to talke away those benifits that were hard earned dollars. THis is an unfair trade off.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE